(b)that is required in order to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations. You can find the Montana Unit Ownership Act (Condominiums) under Title 70, Chapter 23 of the Montana Code. Sunday Canyon, 978 S.W.2d at 656. Find out how in our new article, The Supreme Court's New Disparate Impact Case: What It Means to HOAs. Sign up (6)As used in this section, the following definitions apply: (i)an association of all the owners of real property within a geographic area defined by physical boundaries which: (A)is formally governed by a declaration of covenants, bylaws, or both; (B)may be authorized to impose assessments that, if unpaid, may become a lien on a member's real property; and, (C)may enact or enforce rules concerning the operation of the community or subdivision; or. A court may be governed by several different sets of rules. 333, 341, 922 P.2d 485, 489, that the district court could not broaden a covenant by adding that which was not contained therein. That was the argument the ICP made in the Texas casethat the DHCA's distribution of the credits was, on its face, racially neutral, but that statistics proved the distribution resulted in harm to minorities. To raise funds for repair costs, the association can impose regular assessments on homeowners according to the community Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. You Cant Find Me Anymore: New Jersey Cracks Down on Employer Tracking, New York Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Updates 2022, No more tears: Supreme Court rules damages for emotional distress are not recoverable under Title VI, Title IX, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Affordable Care Act, U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Parameters of Free Speech, Avoid These Practitioner Pitfalls When It Comes to Trade-Secret Misappropriation Trials, Employer overcomes religious-based challenge to vaccine mandate, Elon Musks planned purchase of Twitter reignites questions of open source code security, Res Ipsa Loquitur: The Massachusetts Appeals Court reverses Summary Judgment in favor of allowing a chair to speak for itself, Ohio Appellate Court addresses Permanent and Substantial Deformity, The Eleventh Circuit finds that a qualifying excess judgment for bad faith may be based on a consent judgment, rather than a verdict, Massachusetts High Court Issues Two Important Wage and Hour Decisions, PAGA Manageability Requirement: A Split of Authority in California, New Bridge Projects Raise New Opportunities and Risk Considerations, Georgia legislature passes amendment to O.C.G.A. 243, 245-46, 934 P.2d 165, 166-67. This, the Appellants argue, renders the 1997 Amendment invalid as to their properties. But, in doing so, these HOAs are going directly against Section 70-1-522 of the Montana Code. 6The Windemere Homeowners Association brought this declaratory judgment action seeking enforcement of a 1997 amendment to restrictive covenants on the Appellants' parcels of property near Big Flat Road in Missoula County. 68, 459 N.E.2d 1164, 1169; Caughlin Ranch Homeowners Association v. Caughlin Club (1993), 109 Nev. 264, 849 P.2d 310; and Boyles v. Hausmann (1994), 246 Neb. Eagar, 322 Mich. App. If the terms of the contract are clear, there is nothing for the courts to interpret or construe and the court must determine the intent of the parties from the wording of the contract alone. In 2019, the Montana state government passed State Bill 300 that limits HOA power and protects homeowners' rights to use their property. General - Sections 35-2-101 through 35-2-133 T j:>TCHxLzehovOi![B}dNYPBH#{3{B}Ls5&sQnP,D7fz>6s9g)B]56CC=;\skoGz~2B}rsZ8cScRs yn;p|+&sRN8u You can explore additional available newsletters here. This exception expires, though, when the real property is sold. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. The Connecticut Supreme Court Weighs In, Connecticut Supreme Court finds that apportionment of prior owners of property following drowning death of minor is proper, Watch your step: New Jersey Tort Claims Act Summer law update, Its Time to Makeup For Your Wrongs: Californias AG Declares First CCPA Enforcement Action Against Mega Retailer Sephora, Walmart Pregnancy Accommodation ruling puts pressure on Congress to act on The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, From Viking River Cruises v. Moriana to Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc.: The Arbitrability Of PAGA Actions In California Continues To Shift, Two Carolina Courts Reject COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims, California Court of Appeal rules in favor of policyholder in COVID business interruption case, New tip credit rules hit PA restaurant and service industry employers, FINRA Seeks to Increase Control Over Expungement of Customer Dispute Disclosures, EEOC Updates COVID-19 Workplace Testing Rules: What Employers Need to Know, Maine Healthcare Workers Challenging Vaccine Mandate Cannot Proceed Under Pseudonyms, Music shutdown: Georgia gun laws shoot down Music Midtown Festival, Cyber insurance experiencing Future Shock, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds that Food Delivery App May Enforce Arbitration Agreement Against Drivers, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEYS TAKE NOTE A Voluntary Settlement Agreement May No Longer Bar A Legal Malpractice Action, New Yorks New Sexual Harassment Hotline Could Lead To A Surge In Claims For Employers, Vega v. Tekoh: The Supreme Court Rules that a Violation of Miranda Rights Alone Does Not Give Rise to Damages Under 42 U.S.C. Instead, most HOAs are set up as nonprofit organizations and are therefore subject to the. Therefore, they are bound by this Act. The homeowners association for the neighborhood claimed that this was a violation of the deed restrictions limiting property use to "residential purposes." However, the justices ruled that short-term rentals are residential uses. Also under various federal laws, like employment laws and the Civil Rights Act, plaintiffs have been permitted to prove discrimination not only directlya landlord says, "We don't hire [class of people]"but also indirectly; that is, by showing that policies and practices that seem neutral on their face nonetheless have had a disparate impact on minorities. Is Time Rounding the Next Employment Practice to Fall in California? The 1994 Amendment bifurcated the effect and enforcement of the covenants so that the real property lying west of Big Flat Road in tracts 1 through 5 was separated from the tracts lying east of the road in tracts 6, 7, and 9 through 15. This Act functions similarly to the federal Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Montana Senate must confirm the appointment. The Montana Supreme Court also holds original jurisdiction over writs of habeas corpus and cases that have not yet reached the district courts in which the dispute is entirely legal rather than factual. Find history, Justice biographies, cases, and more information about the Montana Supreme Court, the highest court of the Montana state court system. About Supreme Court Find history, Justice biographies, cases, and more information about the Montana Supreme Court, the highest court of the Montana state court system. c. 93A are not covered under commercial liability insurance policy as damages because of bodily injury, Major Questions for Chevron Deference and Future Environmental Regulations: The Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA, Managing Construction Claims Risk In The Age Of Gen Z and The Great Resignation, The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Rules that Litigation Privilege Protects Attorney from Civil Liability in First Impression Case, Minnesota Just Made it Harder for Insureds to Claim Bad Faith, Pennsylvania Limits Risk Transfer for Snow and Ice Management Services, Massachusetts Appeals Court extends protections of the Statute of Repose, Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of The Transportation Worker Exemption In The Federal Arbitration Act, Transition not substantial completion starts the clock: New Jersey amends statute of limitations for homeowner and condominium association construction defect cases, From property damage disputes to employment disputes, how the Supreme Courts decision in Morgan v. Sundance impacts the fate of arbitration clauses, Persistent Risks and Regulations: New Health Advisories For PFAS, California Tort Law: Brown v. Taekwondo U.S.A. and the no duty to aid rule, Be Careful What You Post: Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Defamation Lawsuits, Supreme Court of Georgia adopts standard for obtaining a protective order to prevent the deposition of high-ranking corporate executives, Executive orders issued during the Covid-19 pandemic did not create an impossibility or cause frustration sufficient to shield restaurant owner from its obligation to pay rent, Eleventh Circuit Finds for Insurer in COVID-19 Case of First Impression in Georgia, A month into recreational cannabis sales, NJ Employers still lack guidance on drugfree workplace enforcement, Down It Goes! But, these condominiums must explicitly elect to follow the Act by recording a declaration in the county recorders office where the property is based. In Lakeland, the provision permitting the change of covenants: [C]learly directs itself to changes of existing covenants, not the adding of new covenants which have no relation to existing ones. 10Because this case was decided on cross-motions for summary judgment, this Court conducts the same evaluation as did the District Court, based upon Rule 56, M.R.Civ.P. I respectfully suggest that the trial court and, now, this Court have done exactly that in the case at bar. Homeowners associations in Montana are bound by certain laws and regulations. In ruling against the homeowners, Gwinnett Superior Court Judge Michael Clark held that the HOA had the right to enforce covenants, but not an affirmative duty to do so. The Montana Unit Ownership Act (Condominiums) regulates the creation, operation, authority, and management of condominium associations in the state. 202, 209, 926 P.2d 756, 761 (citing Audit Services, Inc. v. Systad (1992), 252 Mont. at 484, 795 P.2d at 438. (d)"Real property" has the meaning provided in 70-1-106, except that it is limited to real property governed by a homeowners' association. The library is located in the Joseph P. Mazurek Justice Building at 215 N. Sanders in Helena, Montana. (c)"Person" means one or more individuals or a legal or commercial entity. Homeowners have the sole ability to make amendments to governing documents. The Appellants are tract owners who neither consented to nor approved the 1997 Amendment. Newman v. Wittmer (1996), 277 Mont. We remand to the District Court for consideration of the matter of costs and attorney fees on appeal. Obviously, that is not the law of contracts, nor is it the law of covenants-as our own jurisprudence clearly reflects (Texas case law notwithstanding). The Connecticut Supreme Court finds that the Litigation Privilege extends to claims of bad faith based upon an insurers actions during litigation. (ii)an association of unit owners as defined by 70-23-102 subject to the Unit Ownership Act. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2020 MT195 ELK GROVE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FOUR CORNERS COUNTYWATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellant, ELK GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Montana Non-Profit Corporation, Intervenor and Appellee. In that respect, it is well_settled that [w]here the language of an agreement is clear and unambiguous and, as a result, susceptible to only one interpretation, the duty of the court is to apply the language as written. Carelli v. Hall (1996), 279 Mont. It is important to read and understand all community regulations before purchasing property in an HOA-managed community. C=b4O|OWEisJ~JL33:)=3Kr{S}FJ#_^P:C]. 17In Boyles, the original covenants allowed for changes to [t]hese covenants, water use regulations, restrictions and conditions if a majority of the then owners agreed to change same in whole or in part. Boyles, 517 N.W.2d at 616. <>stream 481, 484, 795 P.2d 436, 438. 100 Mont. :The Act governs the formation, management, powers, and operation of . The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court granting Defendants summary judgment and concluding that Elk Valley Road burdened Lots 70 and 71 to the benefit of other subdivision lot owners for ingress and agree to and from the adjoining off-plat land and concluding that Plaintiffs had no right to obstruct Elk Valley Road. It consists of 13 parts, listed below. (b)"Member" means a person that belongs to a homeowners' association and whose real property is subject to the jurisdiction of the homeowners' association. The Sunday Canyon covenants provided: The covenants, conditions[,] agreements, reservations, restrictions and charges created and established herein for the benefit of said subdivision and each lot therein may be waived, abandoned, terminated, modified, altered or changed as to the whole of said tract or any portion thereof, at any time with the written consent of the owners of 51% of the lots in the tract. These rulings raise the question of whether HOA's can enforce neighborhood covenants selectively as they see fi Of note is that neither court specifically addressed the arbitrary and capricious enforcement of covenants argument advanced by the homeowners. Specifically, this language cannot be used to broaden, extend or enlarge the original covenants to allow for the creation of a homeowners association and to endow that association with various powers. Objectively False: Eleventh Circuit Highlights Importance of Body Cameras, Policyholders obtain rare wins in COVID-19 coverage cases against insurers, Feds Consider Carving Out Exceptions to the Buy America Act, Modular Construction Components: Claim and Defense Considerations. Hilton Casitas HOA 1 CA-CV 17-0543. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. 35As noted, restrictive covenants are construed under the same rules as are other contracts. Each justice on the Supreme Court serves an eight-year term. This Supreme Court Decision Could Af . APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District, The association should then comply with the members request by recording the exception with the recorder of the county and the office of the county clerk where the real property is located. Seven justices serve on the Montana Supreme Court, which reviews appeals directly from district courts. It consists of 13 parts, listed below. However, associations can impose reasonable regulations such as the size of the signs, the placement of the signs, and the time period during which owners can display the signs. 394, 398, 668 P.2d 243, 245. HOA LAWS AND REGULATIONS. in the supreme court of the state of montana 2020 mt305 craig tracts homeowners'association,inc., tara j. chapman & matthew b. losey, donald c. and beverly a. friend, robert j. Most homeowners associations require the signing of a contract upon purchase. There is simply no way to read the cited language in any other fashion without extending the language by implication, without enlarging the language by construction and without broadening the covenant by adding that which is not contained therein. Did the court err in determining that the 1997 Amendment is valid and binding upon the Appellants' parcels even though the amendment did not contain any legal descriptions of the tracts of land owned by the Appellants? The exception is when homeowners provide a written agreement to follow such restrictions at the time they are adopted. Does the court's determination that the paving of Windemere Drive was done to address health and safety concerns of the residents represent reversible error? I would reverse. 201, 208-09, 536 P.2d 1185, 1189, that restrictive covenants should not be extended by implication or enlarged by construction and, in Jarrett v. Valley Park, Inc. (1996), 277 Mont. The Governor has 30 days to choose a nominee from this list, or otherwise the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will make the decision. He interpreted the HOAs governing documents as providing that right but not making it an obligation. The Supreme Court also reviews appeals from the workers compensation and water courts. TIPS FOR NAVIGATING THIS PAGE This page categorizes court rules as outlined below. Third Circuit finds no nexus between retailers mode of operation and water on store floor. The email address cannot be subscribed. Did the District Court err in determining that the clause of the restrictive covenants allowing for amendment authorized the creation of new or unexpected restrictions not contained or contemplated in the original covenants? FHA Certification: The New Risk of HOA Discrimination Claims, Accommodation Requests Under the Fair Housing Act: Best Practices to Avoid Discrimination Claims & Lawsuits, The New Federal Housing Administration Rules and Your HOA, what is the grace period to replace board members, Certified mail for ANY notices to homeowners. A candidate to serve on the Court must be a U.S. citizen who has been a resident of Montana for at least two years. HOAs can no longer force homeowners to comply with more rigorous restrictions than they agreed to when they purchased the property. Worse, this case will open the door to allowing majority property owners in a subdivision to violate restrictive covenants covering the subdivision and, concomitantly, to abridge the reasonable and justifiable expectations and rights of minority property owners whenever and for no other reason than that the majority determine that it is in its best interest to do so. In coming to this conclusion, the Court relied heavily on its past decisions. A homeowner can claim the benefit of this bill by requesting their HOA to record the exception. To access all Orders, Correspondence, and other Events relating to the selected rule, use the link under Rule History. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court granting Defendants summary judgment and concluding that Elk Valley Road burdened Lots 70 and 71 to the benefit of other subdivision lot owners for ingress and agree to and from the adjoining off-plat land and concluding that Plaintiffs had no right to obstruct Elk Valley Road. (4)Nothing in this section may be construed to prevent the enforcement of a covenant, condition, or restriction limiting the types of use of a member's real property as long as the covenant, condition, or restriction applied to the real property at the time the member acquired the member's interest in the real property. Wilson v. Playa de Serrano 2 CA-CV 2005-0072. These include details regarding the election of the board of directors, voting procedures, quorum requirements, term limits, and other details of how the HOA will be run. If an account becomes delinquent, the HOA has the power to place liens on the property and, in extreme cases, can even foreclose on the property despite on-time mortgage payments. We therefore hold that the District Court did not err in determining that the clause of the restrictive covenants allowing for amendment authorized the creation of new or unexpected restrictions not contained or contemplated in the original covenants. However, even if this statement represents an inference on the part of the court, it is not essential to the court's decision that the 1997 Amendment is enforceable. Californias Attorney General Is Investigating Mobile Apps Compliance with the CCPA, Illinois Supreme Court Shifts BIPA Landscape with 5-Year Limitations Period Applicable to All Claims, New Yorks 175-Year-Old Wrongful Death Statute Lives on, Scathing Text Message to Employee After Maternity Leave Leads Ohio Law Firm to Part Ways with Partner, The Power of Rule 11 to Punish Bad Faith Litigation Conduct, FCC Proposes new reporting rules for the telecom sector in response to increased data breaches, Kentucky Adopts New Rules of Appellate Procedure, Class action alleges high levels of forever chemicals in Simply brand juice. If, as is conceded here, there are no genuine issues of material fact, our standard of review is whether the District Court erred in determining that the successful movant for summary judgment was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Thus, the court effectively ruled that the HOA could enforce covenants as it saw fit. Specifically, the, Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed the conclusion of the district court that the more than three-year delay between Defendant's arrest and his subsequent criminal trial did not violate his constitutional right to a speedy trial,. The covenants, conditions, restrictions and uses created and established herein may be waived, abandoned, terminated, modified, altered or changed as to the whole of the said real property or any portion thereof with the written consent of the owners of sixty-five percent (65%) of the votes from the real property described herein above. On Friday, however, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the first of those decisions, a 1985 ruling that required property owners to take their complaints to the state courts first. 26Did the court err in determining that the 1997 Amendment is valid and binding upon the Appellants' parcels even though the amendment did not contain any legal descriptions of the tracts of land owned by the Appellants? at 265, 900 P.2d at 903. 34As the majority acknowledges, we stated in Higdem v. Whitham (1975), 167 Mont. (b)When a member claims the benefit of this subsection (1), the member shall request that the homeowners' association record, or allow recording of, the exception applicable to the member. FTXs collapse and the push for centralized regulation of digital assets in the U.S. Are we about to see the rise of the right to earn a living? These rulings raise the question of whether HOAs can enforce neighborhood covenants selectively as they see fit. The Governor of Montana may appoint an interim justice if a vacancy arises in the middle of a term. The District Court concluded that such a result could be accomplished here, based upon the language of the particular covenants in effect in this case. %PDF-1.4 Appellants rely on the above reference to covenants created and established herein, contending that this language limits the amendatory power to covenants already present in the 1984 covenants. Each acre shall be entitled to one (1) vote in any election to decide any issues involving waiver, abandonment, termination, modification, alteration or change of restrictive covenants as to a whole of the real property or any portion thereof. I suggest that not only is our decision patently unfair to those litigants, but, as well, it is a departure from our prior case law strictly construing covenants to allow free use of property. About Supreme Court Find history, Justice biographies, cases, and more information about the Montana Supreme Court, the highest court of the Montana state court system. Overview of Midwest Sanitary, Inc. v. Sandberg, Phoenix, and Von Gontard, P.C. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. 1983, Law Firm Ordered to Produce Client Communications Despite the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work-Product Doctrine, Massachusetts high court holds that attorneys fees awarded under G.L. The Bylaws of a Homeowners' Association (HOA) sets forth rules and procedures for how the HOA will function. This process starts when the Montana Judicial Nominating Commission provides the Governor with a list of three to five nominees. uPo 201, 208-09, 536 P.2d 1185, 1189-90. In other words, it does not have discretion to decide whether to review a case. What HOA Boards Need to Know About Regulating Rentals. 13Restrictive covenants are construed under the same rules as are other contracts: courts read declarations of covenants on their four corners as a whole and terms are construed in their ordinary or popular sense. Regulations should protect and preserve the ability of community association homeowners to manage their affairs. There is no intermediate appellate court in the state. Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners, 2003 MT 137, 25, 316 Mont. Additionally, homeowners always have the option of getting involved on their HOA boards in order to push the enforcement of covenants. HOA rules in Montana vary widely. 18In the present case, the original February 1984 declaration of restrictive covenants included the following provision allowing for amendment of the covenants: The covenants, conditions, restrictions and uses created and established herein may be waived, abandoned, terminated, modified, altered or changed as to the whole of the said real property or any portion thereof with the written consent of the owners of sixty-five percent (65%) of the votes from the real property described herein above. In this week's tip, we give you a heads up on a June U.S. Supreme Court decision you may not have noticed amidst all the news of the court's decisions on marriage equality and Obamacare. The board is also responsible for preparing an. As part of the purchase bargain they rightfully expect that such covenants will not be waived, abandoned, terminated, modified, altered or changed by other property owners except in strict compliance with the provisions of the declaration of covenants themselves or in accordance with supervening statutory law. 33I dissent from the Court's decision as to Issue 1, and would therefore not reach Issue 2 or 3. 68, 459 N.E.2d at 1169. Judge David Dickinson reached a similar conclusion in the Forsyth County Superior Court case of Lake Astoria Community Association, Inc. v. Ingmire v. Furr where the homeowner sued the HOA for failing to enforce neighborhood covenants consistently. The court stated that it was of no moment that the creation of the homeowners association may have exceeded the original purpose of the right to amend as contemplated by purchasers prior to the amendment. Homeowners associations in Montana are not regulated by a government agency. We affirm. For Legal Professionals. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. Published March 3, 2023 at 6:45 PM MST. HOA Finances: Boards and Commission: The Supreme Court is responsible for a variety of matters involving rulemaking and oversight of the administration of justice in Montana. 40Here, we have allowed a super-majority of the property owners to abrogate the premises, promises and expectations clearly expressed in the declaration of covenants and upon which the appellants purchased their properties. 20In Sunday Canyon Property Owners Association v. Annett (Tex.App.1998), 978 S.W.2d 654, a Texas court of appeals considered restrictive covenant language remarkably similar to the language in the present case. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 13N HARBOR VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Montana Corporation, Petitioner and Appellee, v. SAM WALDENBERG and SHIRLEEN WEESE, individually and as Trustees of the S&SW TRUST, Respondents and Appellants. For the first time in more than two decades, Pennsylvania enacts new facility regulations for long-term nursing care. HOAleader 7The parties stipulated that all parties to this lawsuit own or have owned, during times pertinent to this action, residential real estate in Missoula County, Montana, and described on Certificate of Survey (COS) 1131. 12The parties agree that the question of whether restrictive covenants may be amended to oblige a nonconsenting landowner to new or different use restrictions is a question of first impression in Montana. It is the responsibility of the association board of directors to maintain detailed records including accounting records, member information, minutes to all official meetings, financial statements, the most recent annual report, articles of incorporation, bylaws, and any amendments made. It provides no protection whatsoever; it is worthless. In Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, the court defined the dispute as one over where housing for low-income persons should be constructed in Dallas . Since there are no formal regulations regarding HOAs specifically, community rules can vary drastically. The primary purpose of an HOA is to protect property values and provide maintenance to any common elements within the community such as streets, sidewalks, pools, and clubhouses. Justice JIM REGNIER delivered the Opinion of the Court. 333, 341, 922 P.2d 485, 489, we clarified that our meaning was that the district court could not broaden the covenant by adding a limitation not contained therein.. The covenant language used in all three cases is markedly different from that used here. uZ[-WP_JoqBnPzQ2Bee u5)3-22kBwRKC-=5>_~w8TF;}U22=C=.go2A:uG2 tJ'3XE|A{;3[EG\ST80Hw;qC=Sc9gd>Udz{zPGLsp(2]uvaLs`w]_[1cJhn~8p{1]]igKzCLn~p85o(qF}Jo)I%1~p$qFso)54dJQey 2Y _$DM_,4*+eEa93@82hG ChatGPT: Has Artificial Intelligence Finally Defeated Alan Turing? The Montana Nonprofit Corporation Act regulates non-profit corporations in relation to corporate procedure, structure, and management. Attorneys & Judges: The Montana Supreme Court governs matters such as attorney admission to the State Bar of Montana, attorney discipline, and judicial standards. The court determined that the Windemere Homeowners Association, Inc., had authority, under a 1997 Amendment to restrictive covenants, to assess against subdivision tract owners the costs of paving a common road. 1This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County. The court determined that the Windemere Homeowners Association, Inc., had authority, under a 1997 Amendment to restrictive covenants, to assess against subdivision tract owners the costs of paving a common road. 261, 264, 900 P.2d 901, 903. (2)A successor-in-interest to a member's real property may not claim the benefit of subsection (1) to the extent that the homeowners' association entered into, amended, or enforced a covenant, condition, or restriction before the successor-in-interest purchased the real property, even if the covenant, condition, or restriction was not enforceable against the previous owner pursuant to subsection (1), unless the successor-in-interest is owned by or shares ownership with the previous member or unless the successor-in-interest is a lender that acquired the real property through foreclosure.